If That Isn’t Eugenicist Thinking, What Is?

“I think the philosophy of RH bill is that we must learn to produce quality people in this world instead of producing people who only end up as, say, beggars on the streets, scavengers, or sellers of cheap or prohibited items. This, I think, is the real valid argument in favor of the RH bill,” he added.

(emphasis ours)

The latest from former Pres. Fidel V. Ramos. ETA: That link isn’t working anymore. Guess Inquirer was ordered to do damage control, so here’s Google’s Cached Page.

How is that, pray tell, that different from these?

It does not, however, by any means seem impossible, that by an attention to breed, a certain degree of improvement, similar to that among animals, might take place among men. Whether intellect could be communicated may be a matter of doubt: but size, strength, beauty, complexion, and perhaps even longevity are in a degree transmissible. The error does not seem to lie, in supposing a small degree of improvement possible, but in not discriminating between a small improvement, the limit of which is undefined, and an improvement really unlimited. As the human race however could not be improved in this way, without condemning all the bad specimens to celibacy, it is not probable, that an attention to breed should ever become general;

– Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population

Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind…. Any group of farmers who permitted their best stock not to breed, and let all the increase come from the worst stock, would be treated as fit inmates for an asylum…. Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens of the wrong type. The great problem of civilization is to secure a relative increase of the valuable as compared with the less valuable or noxious elements in the population… The problem cannot be met unless we give full consideration to the immense influence of heredity…

– Theodore Roosevelt, in a letter to Charles B. Davenport, about “degenerates reproducing”

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing… War… has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s… There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority…

– Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society.

As an advocate of birth control I wish … to point out that the unbalance between the birth rate of the ‘unfit’ and the ‘fit,’ admittedly the greatest present menace to civilization, can never be rectified by the inauguration of a cradle competition between these two classes. In this matter, the example of the inferior classes, the fertility of the feeble-minded, the mentally defective, the poverty-stricken classes, should not be held up for emulation…. On the contrary, the most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”

– Margaret Sanger, The Eugenic Value of the Birth Control Propaganda, Birth Control Review, October 1921.

Malthus, Roosevelt, Russell, Sanger, eugenicists all. The FVR quote fits in rather nicely, don’t you think?

Over and over, RH bill proponents have decried this connection — here’s a fierce denial from Likhaan, another from their supporters at Filipino Freethinkers, yet another vehement (though entertaining) defense from the same atheist group, and more from confused followers of confused celebrities promoting the RH bill. Is it really that much of a stretch? We don’t think so.

Over and over, we’ve said that here. Open minds should at least recognize the bill for what it really is.

Just last week, FVR was at the Crowne Plaza, celebrating at a posh event organized and attended by RH Bill promoters; pics here. Thanks, FVR, for shedding more light on the RH bill’s ultimate goal. Clearer now, n’est-ce pas?

Tagged with: , , , , ,
Posted in Exposés
One comment on “If That Isn’t Eugenicist Thinking, What Is?
  1. […] To know more about what FVR said, read If That Isn’t Eugenicist Thinking, What Is? […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: